Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: April 15, 2025

Apr 15, 2025 - 10:00 am
Google

Financial Times Interviews Head Of Google Search, Elizabeth Reid

Apr 15, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google

Google AI Overviews Linking Over & Over Again To Itself

Apr 15, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Again Says Structured Data Does Not Make Your Site Rank Better

Apr 15, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google

Google Bug Product Snippet Image Carousel

Apr 15, 2025 - 7:21 am
Google

Google Tests AI Mode Shortcut In Search Bar

Apr 15, 2025 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good