Relevancy Rules

Dec 3, 2003 - 10:49 pm 0 by
Filed Under Search Theory

I wish that just once a SEO person that complains about their ranking sucking (like after the Florida update) could give a legitimate argument about why their site is more relevant than others. So far, all I've seen is lots of things like... "my anchor text is perfect", "my H1 and title tags are perfect", etc...

What I would like to see is a SEO type person pull some random person off the street, and convince THEM why their site is unquestionably more relevant than others ranked above them.

While I'm sure there are cases of mis-ranking (based on relevancy) out there, I think they are the minority. Search engines are machines, and they are fallible. But ultimately they are going for most relevant, not most optimized.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Follow

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: November 22, 2024

Nov 22, 2024 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Core Update Heated, Site Reputation Abuse Expands, Site Wide Search Signals, DOJ On Chrome, AI Overview Ads & More

Nov 22, 2024 - 8:01 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Search Console Indexing Reports Lagging By 7 Days

Nov 22, 2024 - 7:55 am
Google

Google Things To Know Tests Side By Side Results

Nov 22, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google On Too Many Network Requests & SEO

Nov 22, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google

Google's People Also Search In Images

Nov 22, 2024 - 7:31 am
Previous Story: Google Fault-Tolerance Simply Too Good