Is a Great Design A Sure-Shot Way for Links?

Oct 20, 2008 - 7:27 am 2 by
Filed Under Link Building

What would you prefer:

* A pretty website that has no content * An ugly website that has a lot of content

If you were building links, which kind of site would you prefer to link to? In a WebmasterWorld discussion, it seems that appearances may not matter. A "nice clean" look may be fine, though.

Some disagree and believe that aesthetically pleasing sites are likely to be linked more than other sites. Most people do not feel that this sentiment is appropriate -- the content is really the most important thing for link-building, according to many webmasters. Of course, it depends on the niche, but people want informative content. Think about Wikipedia, for example. Is it "pretty?" Nope -- it's clean and neat -- but it has a lot of content that many people are looking for.

Forum discussion continues at WebmasterWorld.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: February 21, 2025

Feb 21, 2025 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Ranking Volatility, In-Content Learning, Google AI With Ads, Local & More

Feb 21, 2025 - 8:01 am
Google Ads

Google Response Search Ads (RSAs) Second Headline In Sitelinks & More

Feb 21, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google

Google Hotel Results Tests Book With Official Site Box

Feb 21, 2025 - 7:41 am
Bing Search

Bing Copilot AI Answers Tabbed Carousel Card

Feb 21, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google Ads

Google Ads To Stop Placing Your Ads On Parked Domains By Default

Feb 21, 2025 - 7:21 am
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: October 17, 2008