Google Does Accept MRSS Formatted Video Sitemaps

Nov 20, 2008 - 8:03 am 2 by

Since we have concluded video is important for your overall search efforts, I figured I follow up about a recent thread I spotted at Google Groups about the question on if Google supports MRSS as a format for Video Sitemaps.

The quick answer is yes, but it is not so clear from their documentation. MRSS, which is Media RSS, is one of the two formats Google seems to accept. I submitted an MRSS feed as a test and it did realize and label the feed as MRSS, but my feed did have some errors.

mRSS Video Sitemaps in Google

Googler, JohnMu, explained in the thread:

Yes, we do support mRSS for video Sitemaps. It's not explicitly mentioned, which may cause some confusion (we'll fix that :-) - thanks for bringing it up).

What you can do is the following: Just submit your mRSS file as a normal Video Sitemap in Webmaster Tools. Once we start processing it, you should see the mRSS information in the Sitemaps information page in Webmaster Tools to confirm that we're processing it correctly.

So if you have a video sitemap in MRSS format that you already publish, it might be worth trying to submit that to Google as well.

Forum discussion at Google Groups.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
- YouTube
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: December 18, 2024

Dec 18, 2024 - 10:00 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Video On Google Exploit With End Points Reveal Interesting Ranking Signals

Dec 18, 2024 - 7:51 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Forbes Fires Freelancers Over Google's Site Reputation Abuse Policy

Dec 18, 2024 - 7:41 am
Google

Google Search Tests Rich Things To Do Image Carousel

Dec 18, 2024 - 7:31 am
Google

Google Search Shadow On Hover Of Search Results

Dec 18, 2024 - 7:21 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Tests Double Serving Ads From Same Advertiser On Same Page

Dec 18, 2024 - 7:11 am
Previous Story: Daily Search Forum Recap: November 19, 2008