Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
I'd be interested in what Sachin searched for so we can get an understanding if there's a link between what was searched for and the chosen words.
The only reason so many datacenters are needed is so people can generate massive amounts of AI slop. How many hundreds of billions should be poured into datacenters so people can produce Bigfoot or baby Trump AI slop videos? Winning the AI race against China is high on Trump's agenda, but wasting billions on these datacenters so they can be used to create AI slop is a huge waste of money. A real national AI strategy in place could have prevented this waste, while protecting intellectual property, but wasteful projects is where politicians and corporations get filthy rich.
Michigan is trying to repeal tax breaks given for datacenters, but they will probably get sued if they pass the law. Other states are realizing these datacenters are bad too, which is why I think a taxpayer funded Federal slush fund will become available for datacenters in the future. These big tech companies aren't going invest their own money, without heavy taxpayer support, so people can create Feeble Knievel videos.
Same here. 14 yrs old site, from 200-250K views per day to 30K views. I really don't know what is happening. Many articles deindexed and CWV huge drop with absolutely no changes from our part.
I think I figured out what he was getting at. He may think I'm trying to win an argument. I'm not really arguing but trying to find what value China traffic has. Would also be interesting to see what measures he has taken to block bots and filter from analytics to get a clearer picture on genuine traffic. Anyway I'll delete my last post since I was kinda clueless about his winning something reply at the time.
I understand what you mean by consistent; they've never changed their tune, unlike JD Vance, who wanted to crush Google before the election and who is now their biggest fan. We may disagree with Bernie & Liz, but their message hasn't changed.
As Bernie beats his chest, big tech friendly bills are moving forward to possibly become law. Yesterday the US House advanced the SPEED Act which will remove hurdles to rapid construction/deployment of new datacenters. The full house could vote on it this week.
<b>Bill to ease Big Tech project permits advances in House</b> - <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/16/ai-congres-permitting-speed-act.html?msockid=08a97d9a4e1d6dbf1d446b5f4ff06c94">https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/16/ai-congres-permitting-speed-act.html?msockid=08a97d9a4e1d6dbf1d446b5f4ff06c94</a>
<blockquote>But recently, as AI has been seen as an increasingly important sector, support has grown among Democrats for easing the permitting process.
And pressure has increased on Congress as China laps the U.S. in building out AI infrastructure, and as energy-hungry AI data centers stress an aging electric grid.
“We’ve made it entirely too difficult to build big things in this country, and if we do not reform that, that will be a powerful gift that we are giving to China,” said Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., a member of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, in an interview with CNBC.</blockquote>
Nah, they'll just get ignored as part of the minority party. It's not surprising though--Elizabeth Warren has always been for tech regulation, and Bernie has been, and I'm sure most that post in these comments won't agree with me--the most consistent 'for the people' politician in the history of the US senate.
<a href="https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/bernie-sanders-calls-for-halt-on-ai-data-center-construction-wants-to-ensure-that-the-technology-benefits-all-of-us-not-just-the-1/ar-AA1SwQqF">https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/bernie-sanders-calls-for-halt-on-ai-data-center-construction-wants-to-ensure-that-the-technology-benefits-all-of-us-not-just-the-1/ar-AA1SwQqF</a>
Sadly it is Bernie Sander & Elizabeth Warren, although I welcome this, I doubt they'll get much support, be ignored as socialists.
What value does Chinese traffic have? China doesn't spend money and clicks used to be worth .0001 a click. Been a long time since I was in ad networks, but they all looked at Chinese traffic as garbage. Too much of it and it would flag the account for possible suspension.
Ranking first on Google won't do anything to move the traffic needle. Look down thread and see the others who say their top ranks are at the bottom of the serps. Count me in for this - thousands of daily visits for being number one a couple years ago to just three lousy visits a day. That's for being number one. So if you are fighting to be number one, it isn't worth the effort cause all you'll get is bragging rights and no traffic.
Just like it's Trump's economy, Shitdar owns the collective shit pile clogging Google's serp toilet bowl.
I'm similar, rank first page on B&DDG but not on Google. Google's aim is to force people to use AI Overviews and click on ads; excellent content really doesn't figure in their objections, despite what they say.
interesting thing is that the site is getting chinesse traffic, but GSC reflects that too, it means that it shows in china in higher SERPs, rather than just bot / GA4 anomaly
Return Merchandise Authorization which is an internal number assigned to the return.
Agentic shopping may be the end of direct to consumer sales for us because our customers must put in a little more thought then what AI is prepared to do for them.
Sure, I only hope my reply will not get flagged by Disqus. Examples: <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1pn8xg7/help_december_12th_traffic_of_merchant_listings/">https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1pn8xg7/help_december_12th_traffic_of_merchant_listings/</a> , <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1pmc0ys/google_core_update_2025_december/">https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1pmc0ys/google_core_update_2025_december/</a>