Below are the most recent 30 comments. I try to keep it clean of comment spam, but some times things
get through and it takes me several hours to get to it. So please excuse any of that comment spam.
Dead, dead since December 12, no recovery, no further volatility here, just completely and utterly dead. I have months, thankfully. If no course correction is achieved in that time, after a 98% drop (simply overnight) following years of growth, I'll lose the roof above my head and much more. Love that.
One of the best practices that was bestowed upon me years ago was to wait 20 days before making major changes. I do not know if this still holds, but the volatility across the big G landscape seems fairly consistent with a cadence-like pattern. I am not an expert, and I'm sure there are better opinions from better SEOs on this forum. Just sharing what I do, and what has been mostly beneficial to me and my scope of work. Good luck!
<blockquote>I have long defended the private-property rights of internet companies</blockquote>If Rand Paul defended the private property rights of others, why does he show no concern about companies like Google helping themselves to our content? Rand Paul is nothing more than a rube who works in a cube.
Rank looks like monster teeth. Up, down, up, down, up, down. No consistency that follows any type of cadence. This seems to be the norm for one week each month since September 2025. Our site has zero spam, and we have cultivated content, PDPs, and Silo structures across nearly the entire website (38,000+ pg). I can honestly say that we have done a good, honest job. At this point, I ignore rankings if traffic stays. We just keep on task.
one of my client's local page is observing too much volatility since 8th of Jan 2026. Worst thing is google is ranking website which are targeting country specific keyword instead of LOCAL focus pages. I need one suggestion shall I change the content or wait for sometime?
He’s oversimplifying. Some “bite-sized chunks” are actually <i><b>helpful</b></i> to our <i><b>viewers</b></i>. And fortunately they are <b>also</b> AI- and SEO-friendly. For example, informative H2s and concise, well-crafted paragraphs. It’s not an either-or. Both goals are good — a good product for viewers and also for AI and search engines.
Human traffic is the only thing that matters, and ranking #1 still results in no traffic. I've seen total traffic decline and also shift to a reduced quality. Google is now sending us garbage traffic from countries we don't sell in such as Columbia, Gabon, Zambia, etc. Is it a bug, geo broken or by design so Google can steal converting traffic and replace it with junk? I select the later.
Current volatility is probably just a continuation of Google's economic crimes against humanity. There are some politicians changing their tune about Google, for different reasons, when they are the victims.
<b>Rand Paul: I’ve changed my mind — Google and YouTube can’t be trusted to do the right thing and must be reined in</b> - <a href="https://nypost.com/2026/01/19/opinion/rand-paul-ive-changed-my-mind-google-and-youtube-cant-be-trusted-to-do-the-right-thing-and-must-be-reined-in/">https://nypost.com/2026/01/19/opinion/rand-paul-ive-changed-my-mind-google-and-youtube-cant-be-trusted-to-do-the-right-thing-and-must-be-reined-in/</a>
<blockquote>Advocating for liability for Google is no small step for me. I have long defended the private-property rights of internet companies and long defended them against overzealous, partisan abuses of antitrust law, even when I was angry with YouTube for its policies that silenced my attempts to educate the public on the potentially deadly consequences of relying on cloth masks to prevent transmission of COVID-19.</blockquote>
<blockquote>"Google will suffer immediate and irreparable harm as a result of the transfer of this proprietary information to Google’s competitors, and may additionally suffer irreparable financial and reputational harm should the data provided to competitors be leaked or hacked."</blockquote>What about all the irreparable harm Google has caused the world because of their economic crimes against humanity? For these crimes Google SHOULD suffer significant and irreparable harm so they become incapable of harming markets any further.
Though the Dishonorable Judge Meathead's remedies are weak, Google's poor excuse to not have to share data is even weaker.
Thank you. This is interesting, maybe Barry can see this as well, if we all come together and look at changes near investment windows we could see a pattern emerging. This is good evidence for Adsense that money is dialled down for some of us - during updates/near investor meetings. I had a dip in December that I am concerned over. I think Adsense may need more accountability as right now the advertisors and publishers do not have transparency of earnings - and this is concerning me , I will get a report together of my experiences.
Same. They've set a website traffic cap, and no matter how hard you try, it won't go beyond that. New articles aren't even shown in Discover, News, or even search. What's happening now isn't even an update, it's something worse.
Hi Barry Schwartz, unfortunately I posted a detailed comment with a finding and an image (twice and it was automatically removed probably by a spam filter). Can you help me with the display?
When analyzing long-term data from AdSense, Google Ads, and Google Search Console, an interesting—yet rarely discussed—pattern emerges: around the periods when Alphabet (Google) announces its quarterly financial results, the Google ecosystem tends to become noticeably more volatile.
For many publishers and website owners, these windows often coincide with:
sudden drops in AdSense earnings (RPM, CPC, fill rate),
irregular behavior in Google Ads delivery,
temporary instability in organic search traffic (impressions and rankings).
It is important to clarify that these fluctuations are not, in most cases, the result of SEO penalties or technical issues on individual websites. More often, they appear within broader phases of system-wide optimization and recalibration.
From an operational standpoint, it is reasonable for a publicly traded company to continuously adjust its monetization and delivery mechanisms, provided these adjustments remain within the applicable legal framework and existing contractual terms. However, for publishers, the practical outcome is increased volatility—particularly in the timeframes surrounding earnings calls (roughly 2–4 weeks before and 1–2 weeks after).
During these periods, publishers may observe:
temporary redistribution of advertising budgets,
changes in auction dynamics,
algorithmic adjustments that indirectly affect visibility and monetization.
As a result, small and mid-sized publishers tend to be more exposed, especially on organic and mobile traffic, while partial recovery is often observed after the reporting cycle concludes.
For this reason, such movements are best interpreted as systemic volatility rather than individual site-level failure or non-compliance. A balanced approach includes:
diversifying monetization channels,
avoiding major SEO changes during high-volatility windows,
evaluating performance trends over longer timeframes instead of reacting to short-term drops.
In conclusion, Google’s earnings season impacts more than just investors. It also introduces measurable fluctuations across the broader publishing and advertising ecosystem. Recognizing this context helps publishers manage expectations realistically—without drifting into speculation or premature conclusions regarding legality or intent. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/95754d87f13942ef78ade83d7f515bd00a6cda928accaa28bed4e5447780c0b1.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d46e795cc1d229232260e2fffda15305aa4583ddf27f993bd82125ffd0ccfd41.png
A Quiet Pattern: AdSense and Organic Traffic Volatility Around Google’s Earnings Reports
When analyzing long-term data from AdSense, Google Ads, and Google Search Console, an interesting—yet rarely discussed—pattern emerges: around the periods when Alphabet (Google) announces its quarterly financial results, the Google ecosystem tends to become noticeably more volatile.
For many publishers and website owners, these windows often coincide with:
sudden drops in AdSense earnings (RPM, CPC, fill rate),
irregular behavior in Google Ads delivery,
temporary instability in organic search traffic (impressions and rankings).
It is important to clarify that these fluctuations are not, in most cases, the result of SEO penalties or technical issues on individual websites. More often, they appear within broader phases of system-wide optimization and recalibration.
From an operational standpoint, it is reasonable for a publicly traded company to continuously adjust its monetization and delivery mechanisms, provided these adjustments remain within the applicable legal framework and existing contractual terms. However, for publishers, the practical outcome is increased volatility—particularly in the timeframes surrounding earnings calls (roughly 2–4 weeks before and 1–2 weeks after).
During these periods, publishers may observe:
temporary redistribution of advertising budgets,
changes in auction dynamics,
algorithmic adjustments that indirectly affect visibility and monetization.
As a result, small and mid-sized publishers tend to be more exposed, especially on organic and mobile traffic, while partial recovery is often observed after the reporting cycle concludes.
For this reason, such movements are best interpreted as systemic volatility rather than individual site-level failure or non-compliance. A balanced approach includes:
diversifying monetization channels,
avoiding major SEO changes during high-volatility windows,
evaluating performance trends over longer timeframes instead of reacting to short-term drops.
In conclusion, Google’s earnings season impacts more than just investors. It also introduces measurable fluctuations across the broader publishing and advertising ecosystem. Recognizing this context helps publishers manage expectations realistically—without drifting into speculation or premature conclusions regarding legality or intent.
I have a CRM software in Romania and UAE. Every time I activate Google ADS, the phone rings, when I turn it off it rings less often. I am in position 1-4 on the main keywords. Google has achieved what it set out to do. Can it stop the chaos? :-)