Google: Robot.txt Blank Vs Allow Is No Difference

Nov 29, 2019 - 7:48 am 0 by

Google Locked Out

John Mueller from Google said in a Reddit thread that using a blank robots.txt file or just stating all is allowed in that file is the same thing, it doesn't matter which you use.

He said "Doesn't matter" when he was asked Is there a difference? I've always used Dissallow: (blank) as it seems more efficient. But the current client is using Allow: /.

He said "Doesn't matter. You can also just use a comment like:"

# there are not robots.txt directives here

I barely ever use robots.txt files on my sites but as you all know, I like to share as much as I can with others. :P

There are good reasons to block sections of your sites and URLs in a robots.txt but you do not have to, if you don't want to.

Forum discussion at Reddit.

 

Popular Categories

The Pulse of the search community

Search Video Recaps

 
Video Details More Videos Subscribe to Videos

Most Recent Articles

Search Forum Recap

Daily Search Forum Recap: January 17, 2025

Jan 17, 2025 - 10:00 am
Search Video Recaps

Search News Buzz Video Recap: Google Search Volatility Cooling, AI Overviews Penalties, Maps Pin Hack Fix, Search Market Share & More

Jan 17, 2025 - 8:01 am
Google Ads

Scary Google Ads Phishing Scam

Jan 17, 2025 - 7:51 am
Google Ads

Google Ads Search Max Coming Soon?

Jan 17, 2025 - 7:41 am
Google Search Engine Optimization

Google Updates Examples Of Events & Estimated Salary Images In Structured Data Docs

Jan 17, 2025 - 7:31 am
Google

Google Testing AI Generated What People Are Saying

Jan 17, 2025 - 7:21 am
Previous Story: Google My Business Adds Job Types For Services With Services Editor